The charge sheet, which runs into thousands of pages, lists the evidences against the accused,' said # the police."The accused have been booked under IPC sections 384 (extortion), 386 (extortion by putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt) and 387 (putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt, in order to commit extortion) at the Thane Nagar police station. It also includes statement of the witnesses. Iqbal Kaskar and two of his aides were arrested in September 2017 by the Thane police in a separate case.In October 2017, the police had registered an offence of extortion based on the complaint of the builder against Iqbal Kaskar and the gang members of Dawood. (Photo: File) Thane: The city police have filed a charge sheet against fugitive don Dawood Ibrahim and his brothers Iqbal Kaskar, and Anees Ibrahim in connection with an extortion case filed on the complaint by a prominent builder in 2017.Wholesale Acrylic Photo Frame Sheets SuppliersThe charge sheet was filed in the district court on Thursday," a senior inspector of Thane police's Anti-Extortion Cell (AEC) said on Saturday.Iqbal Kaskar and two of his aides were arrested in September 2017 by the Thane police AEC in a separate case of extortion of Rs 30 lakh and four flats from a builder."The charge sheet, which runs into thousands of pages, lists the evidences against the accused," the police official said, adding, "The vital documents attached to the charge sheet include papers related to the land deal along with the payment proof..During investigation, the alleged role of Dawood and Anees also came to light following which both were shown as wanted accused in connection with the offence, the police had said. According to the builder's complaint, Kaskar had threatened and extorted Rs 3 crore from him over a deal of a 38-acre land in Gorai area
The court also directed Tihar Jail authorities to provide her specialised treatment within 3 days as she complained of various ailments. Enforcement Directorate (ED).Shivani Saxena and her husband Rajiv are residents of Palm Jumeirah in Dubai, an archipelago which is home to the most expensive properties in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the charge sheet said.The ED had also arrested in this case Delhi-based businessman Gautam Khaitan who is currently out on bail.It alleged that the two Dubai-based firms were the entities "through which the proceeds of crime have been routed and further layered and integrated in buying the immovable properties/shares, among others" in this case.A special court, on Wednesday, sought response from the Enforcement Directorate on the bail plea of a woman director of two Dubai-based firms in a money laundering case related to the Rs 3,600 crore VVIP chopper deal.The ED had on September 13 filed a charge sheet against her and others.On January 1, 2014, India had scrapped the contract with Finmeccanicas British subsidiary AgustaWestland for supplying 12 AW-101 VVIP choppers to the IAF over alleged breach of China acrylic sheets manufacturers contractual obligations and charges of kickbacks of Rs 423 crore paid by it to secure the deal.The court also directed Tihar Jail authorities to provide her specialised treatment within three days as she complained of various serious ailments. It had registered a PMLA case in 2014 and named 21 people in its money laundering FIR.Special Judge Arvind Kumar directed the agency to file by October 6, its reply to the application moved by Shivani Saxena, an "active" director of Dubai-based M/s UHY Saxena and M/s Matrix Holdings."These companies further siphoned off the said money in the name of consultancy contracts to M/s Interstellar Technologies Limited, Mauritius and others which were further transferred to M/s UHY Saxena and # M/s Matrix Holdings Ltd, Dubai and others," the charge sheet had alleged.The agency claimed that its probe had found that AgustaWestland, United Kingdom, had "paid an amount of Euro 58 million as kickbacks" through two Tunisia-based firms.In her bail application, the accused has claimed that she was not required in the case because investigation was already complete since the charge sheet has already been filed
As per the GST law a return of all sales or trade made in a month have to be filed online by the 10th of the following month. GST return forms for all kinds of trade/sales, including composition, ecommerce, non-resident taxable person, would be put up on GSTN website by mid of July.Just five days before the Goods and Services Tax (GST) is rolled out, GST Network will on June 25 launch an offline excel sheet format for use by traders and businesses to upload sales data on the GST portal.Navin Kumar, Chairman of GST-Network, said the GST color acrylic sheets manufacturers return forms for all kinds of trade/sales, including composition, ecommerce, non-resident taxable person, would be put up on GSTN website by mid of July.The GSTN is the IT backbone provider for the new indirect tax regime. As per the GST law, a return of all sales or trade made in a month have to be filed online by the 10th of the following month. So if GST is rolled out from July 1, the sales data has to be uploaded on GSTN portal by August 10."We will release on GSTN website the excel sheet, from where offline tool will take the data, by June 25. It will help taxpayers to know the kind of format in which information is to be given," Kumar told PTI.In the excel sheet, the businesses would have to give details of transaction, like invoice number, GSTIN of buyer, commodity sold or services given, value of the goods or services sold, the tax incidence and taxes paid.
With regard to the returns, Kumar said the businesses will have to file it only in August."All the forms have been prepared, we are in the process of incorporating changes as per the decision taken in the Council. We will make return forms available sometime by middle of July," he said.Kumar said businesses need not go through GST Suvidha Providers (GSPs) as the offline tool prepared by the GSTN is simple and businesses can save details on it on a daily or weekly basis. He has asked industry to use the offline tool for the initial 1-2 months of GST rollout for hassle free record keeping of invoice details."It is not necessary for businesses to go through GSPs. We have selected GSPs and brought them in picture because we feel they will be able to help big businesses comply with the provisions and they may provide some additional facilities for the businesses."But it is not that if GSPs are not there the businesses will not be able to upload invoices or file returns. Businesses can still do it, only that they will have to upload the invoices regularly using the offline tool," Kumar said.He said the offline tool can upload 19,000 invoices data at one go and that takes half a minute. He said large businesses can continue using their own ERP software for uploading invoices but for the initial couple of months they can use the offline tool."If their ERP is not ready they can still do it using the offline tool. And one lakh invoices per day means they have to do it in five instalments... My advice to people is if they have data more than 10,000 or 20,000 they should upload data every week," he said. Under GST - which will be a single tax in place of multiple central and state levies like excise, service tax and VAT - businesses are required to upload on GSTN portal invoices of their trade every month.
Both of them have been on the run after their names surfaced in connection with the Malegaon blasts.Both of them have been on the run after their names surfaced in connection with the Malegaon blasts. Mumbai: Ram Chandra Kalsangra and Sandeep Dange, the two absconding accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case, have been mentioned as 'RSS workers' in the charge sheet filed by the NIA last week.Naming Kalsangra as accused number 13 and Dange as accused number 14, the NIA has referred to the two as "RSS worker" against the column for occupation in its charge sheet.Both of them have been on the run after their names surfaced in connection with the Malegaon blasts. The duo have been named as accused in other cases too that included Samjhuata train blasts in February 2007 in which 68 people were killed.When asked to comment on its workers being named in the Malegaon charge sheet, RSS Head of Communication department Manmohan Vaidya said, "They were with RSS. We do not know about their whereabouts.
Neither do we know about their involvement in the case."We do not support any kind of violence. But there should be a thorough judicial probe into the entire incident and anyone found guilty should be punished," Vaidya said.Kalsangra and Dange are proclaimed offenders with the CBI and NIA announcing PS sheets factory a cash reward of Rs 10 lakh on information leading to their arrest. An Interpol Red Corner notice has also been issued against the two.According to the NIA charge sheet, the examination of some of the acquaintances and associates of the duo was carried out during which the agency alleged that all the mobile phone numbers traced at the time of the blast at Malegaon were used by the accused.Kalsangra alias Ramji and Dange are alleged to have imparted arms and explosive training to some of the accused at Bagli hill top in Devas of Madhya Pradesh.The two-wheeler, in which the explosive material was planted and placed outside a mosque on September 29, 2008 in Malegaon, was being used by Kalsangra for the last two years, the NIA said. The vehicle was in the name of Sadhvi Pragya Thakur, who has been given a clean chit by the NIA. Seven people were killed in the Malegaon 2008 blast.
The court allowed the CBI’s request for grant of some time after senior advocate Sonia Mathur, representing the agency, informed the judge that sanctions are awaited. However, the former Union minister was not arrayed as an acc-used in the case. Matta and Nitesh Rana requested an adjournment on behalf of the Enforcement Directorate (ED). Chidambaram and other serving or former public servants in the Aircel-Maxis deal case. In the case filed by CBI, Ms Mathur told the court that the agency was expecting sanctions for prosecution from authorities concern-ed in about four weeks.”The investigating agency had on July 19 filed a charge sheet against the Congress leader, his son Karti, 10 individuals including public servants and six companies as accused in the case.”Mr Chidambaram’s name is among the persons against whom sanction for prosecution from authorities concerned was awaited.
The court pulled up the agency for filing the charge sheet without proper sanction and told the CBI that if the required documents are not filed by November 26, the next day of hearing, the court may take appropriate action.The court pulled up the agency for filing the charge sheet without proper sanction and told the CBI that if the required documents are not filed by November 26, the next day of hearing, the court may take appropriate action.Special judge O.The counsel told the court that there were serving public servants and some retired ones against whom the sanctions would be needed before proceeding with their prosecution in the case. If convicted, the offe-nces entail a maximum punishment of seven years.K.Agency requires sanction to prosecute Chidambaram, Karti & 10 others. It is only increasing the pendency of the court.P.
The ED had on July 13 filed a charge sheet again-st Karti and others for the alleged offence of money laundering.The judge said: “If the sanction is not received, appropriate actions will be taken.” Ms Mathur said, “Granting of sanction is under active consideration of the government. Saini said: “You (CBI) should not have filed the charge sheet.A Delhi court on Monday granted seven weeks to clear polycarbonate sheets manufacturers the CBI to obtain sanction to prosecute former Union minister P. The court also adjour-ned a money laundering case, which is an off-shoot of the Aircel-Maxis deal case, against Karti and others, after Ms Mathur and lawyers N. A lot of time of the court has been wasted due to this. The CBI had filed the charge sheet for the alleged offences of cri-minal conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code (IPC), public servant taking illegal gratification, punishment for abetting this offence and public se-rvant committing criminal misconduct under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
